Non-deterministic Turing machines are equivalent to deterministic Push-down automata. Non-deterministic Push-down automata are equivalent to deterministic Pushdown automata.
Only certain sequences of words are considered to be 'grammatical' in a language. Sequential information is critical in a natural language like English. Can you explain this answer? over here on EduRev! Apart from being the largest Computer Science Engineering (CSE) community, EduRev has the largest solved The non-deterministic finite-state automata are equivalent to deterministic finite-state automata. In this chapter we review basic concepts of finite state automata (FSA), and develop probabilistic FSA’s that are useful in natural language applications. The limitations of the corresponding techniques, however, are pointed out more often than their advantages, probably because recent work in this field is not yet described in computer science textbooks. Here, two DFAs are called equivalent if they recognize the same regular language.
This discussion on A minimum state deterministic finite automaton accepting the language L= hasa)15 statesb)11 statesc)10 statesd)9 statesCorrect answer is option 'A'. The use of finite-state machines in natural language processing is certainly not new. In automata theory (a branch of theoretical computer science), DFA minimization is the task of transforming a given deterministic finite automaton (DFA) into an equivalent DFA that has a minimum number of states.